|Re: [cdt-dev] proposal for side-stepping known test failures|
I run the tests with high memory ceilings, too. The only difference I see is OS.
Anyway, the point is there are failures. The failures are not in code I'm sufficiently familiar with, otherwise I'd troubleshoot them. So, I'm going to make them avoidable as per my proposal, unless there are objections.
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Sergey Prigogin [eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:57 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] proposal for side-stepping known test failures
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Cortell John-RAT042 <RAT042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
These tests work for me on Linux when I run them with -Xmx768m -XX:MaxPermSize=192M
These tests were excluded because they were not properly maintained.
Don't know about these.