[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Contribution to Eclipse : IP
|
But we are not lawyers. People at license@xxxxxxxxxxx are :)
Doug.
On 12-05-30 4:00 PM, "Jeff Johnston" <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>FYI: you can find the Eclipse legal process poster at:
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
>
>If you are referring to the EPL in your note below, the EPL license is
>an approved license.
>
>Any non-committer contributions must be verified to be written 100% from
>scratch by the contributor with permission from their employer to
>contribute and must be under the EPL or have a license that is approved
>by Eclipse.org.
>
>The rules for whether the code can be checked-in or whether a CQ
>(Contribution Questionnaire) is required is found on the poster.
>
>-- Jeff J.
>
>On 05/30/2012 10:58 AM, Mathieu fourticq wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am willing to contribute to the eclipse community for the C++ unit
>> part that is being developped for the JUNO version and that was
>> introduced by Anton (xgsa@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:xgsa@xxxxxxxxx>). My aim is
>> to test/debug/tune and contribute if I can to this part of code.
>>
>> I have then asked to my company if I could contribute to the Eclipse
>> community and I am in the final row to get the approval.
>>
>> Now my company request expressively that : "contributions will be made
>> under the Eclipse license only".
>>
>> Is it compatible with yout IP policy ?
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Mathieu Fourticq
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
