[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cdt-dev] indexing results difference between CDT 7.0.x and CDT 8.0
- From: Yevgeny Shifrin <Yevgeny.Shifrin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:10:09 +0300
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Thread-index: AcxR1kpN5DboaF5tTTCkCrJXS1wC6Q==
- Thread-topic: indexing results difference between CDT 7.0.x and CDT 8.0
I am working on big C++ code base. I see difference in indexing results between CDT 7.0.x and CDT 8.0 on exactly the same project with the same configurations.
Indexed 'proj1' (several dozen K of sources and headers) in 2,602.16 sec: ~2M declarations; ~11M+17544 references; ~1K unresolved inclusions; ~1K syntax errors; ~80K unresolved names
Indexed 'proj1' (several dozen K of sources and headers) in 3,428.65 sec: ~2M+35 declarations; ~11M references; ~1K unresolved inclusions; ~1K+25 syntax errors; ~200K unresolved
I would like to understand the root cause for this difference. Is there a regression in CDT 8.0 behavior, or other reason? In CDT 8.0 M7 the statistics were similar to CDT 7.0.2. Is it possible that between CDT 8.0 M7 and CDT 8.0
release, change was submitted that causes this regression. From indexing functionality point of view (in the last month) I did not see regression in CDT 8.0 in compare to CDT 7.0.2. At least in one case CDT 8.0 was "smarter" than CDT 7.0.2.
I would appreciate any comments suggestion on this issue.
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.