[cdt-dev] PDOMCPPBinding.getQualifiedNameCharArray vs PDOMBinding.getQua

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] PDOMCPPBinding.getQualifiedNameCharArray vs PDOMBinding.getQualifiedName

From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:59:13 -0800
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=wICY6fUQr2exF16ZEnVRgipvvrWyMH8HtI30EzrVvrk+dZZVbu/iQ4vowZwOZlu74Q sNJ2oGImUFFX4jw/YmZQ==
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

PDOMCPPBinding.getQualifiedNameCharArray and PDOMBinding.getQualifiedName methods may produce semantically different results due to !(node instanceof ICPPTemplateInstance) condition that is present in the first method, but not in the second one. Is it an oversight, or there is some mysterious truth behind it?

-sergey

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] PDOMCPPBinding.getQualifiedNameCharArray vs PDOMBinding.getQualifiedName
  - From: Schorn, Markus

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] EclipseCon Multicore Debug workshop
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Adding a checker to codan
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] EclipseCon Multicore Debug workshop
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] PDOMCPPBinding.getQualifiedNameCharArray vs PDOMBinding.getQualifiedName
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs