[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[cdt-dev] RE: CApplicationLaunchShortcut and DSF debuggers
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mario Pierro
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 11:01 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] CApplicationLaunchShortcut and DSF debuggers
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to have CApplicationLaunchShortcut generate a launch
> configuration for our DSF debugger integration. Our debugger is using
> CDT's "Local C/C++ Application" launch config type, using a custom
> delegate.
>
> When generating a launch configuration from scratch, it seems that
> CApplicationLaunchShortcut will consider our DSF debugger only via a
> dummy org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core.CDebugger ext point declaration, also
> using a companion org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui.CDebuggerPage to provide
> defaults for the generated launch configuration (see
> CApplicationLaunchShortcut.createConfiguration() ).
>
> Is this the way to do it, or am I missing something?
That is how we used to do it for DSF-GDB as well.
Recent changes have cleaned that up and we no longer make
use of org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core.CDebugger or
org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui.CDebuggerPage
You can look at the changes made in
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=281970#c10
> Should the
> CApplicationLaunchShortcut consider the available launch delegates
> instead of ICDebugger s?
The CApplicationLaunchShortcut no longer needs to deal with launch
delegates (since 10 minutes ago) as fixed by
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=312997
Instead, the preferred launch delegate will be set based
on the global platform preference.
As for the ICDebugger part, the CApplicationLaunchShortcut class
still needs to choose the proper debugger type (e.g. gdb/mi or gdbserver)
but this is for CDI only. We should avoid running this code for DSF.
I have opened a bug about that
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=313200
I think our 'shared' launch story is in better shape now.
Please report any issues you may find.
Thanks
Mar
