Re: [cdt-dev] API breaking change in CDT debug

[Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15/03/2010 20:50, John Cortell wrote:

> Depends. My statement needs some refining :-) Adding a method to a
> non-extendible, non-implementable type doesn't break the API. 

  Well, in that case I'll refine mine too: I only meant "breaks the API" in
the sense that newer code isn't backwardly-compatible with the older version
of the API if it uses that new method.

    cheers,
      DaveK