Re: [cdt-dev] RIP Wascana, Build System discussion

[Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>]

Ed.Swartz@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Of course, a lot of work must go into the implementation of the 
> extensions, to handle parsing and rewriting build scripts.  But by being 
> standard extensions to CDT, standard implementations could be written 
> once (e.g. managed make + standard make, autotools, qmake, etc).
>  
> Would it be appropriate for CDT to provide support like this?  

This is exactly what I've been wishing for.

--
/Jesper