[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CPreprocessor
|
Those are great numbers.
Markus, I'm curious to know where you think the performance gain is coming
from. Is it the new location map?
Mike Kucera
Software Developer
IBM CDT Team, Toronto
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx
Doug Schaefer
<DSchaefer@xxxxxx
m> To
Sent by: "CDT General developers list."
cdt-dev-bounces@e <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
clipse.org cc
Subject
11/14/2007 01:39 RE: [cdt-dev] CPreprocessor
PM
Please respond to
"CDT General
developers list."
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
org>
I don't know. I'm showing a 10-20% improvement with my Firefox tests.
Great work Markus, thanks!
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:03 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CPreprocessor
>
> I have rerun the tests over night and the result is less spectacular,
> you can expect improvements from 0% to 4%. Probably the first results
> were influenced by some other load on my machine, so I need to reset
> expectations:
>
> In detail ACE -6%, TAO -0%, Linux Kernel -5%, Firefox -0%.
> I am happy with the numbers, anyways. I am changing CDT to use
> CPreprocessor.
> I'll keep Scanner2 around until the end of the year, but plan on
> removing it,
> to get started on stuff that depends on the preprocessor.
> Markus.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
> > Sent: Dienstag, 13. November 2007 16:13
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] CPreprocessor
> > Importance: Low
> >
> > Hi,
> > the performance tests for the indexer using the CPreprocessor went
> > really good, I see an overall performance improvement of 5-10% (tested
> > with ACE, TAO, Linux Kernel and Firefox).
> >
> > Given that I want to make the CPreprocessor the default rather sooner
> > than later and support Scanner2 with -Dscanner=Scanner2 for a while.
> > Does anyone object to that?
> > Markus.
> >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=205272
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
