[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CPreprocessor
|
I have rerun the tests over night and the result is less spectacular,
you can expect improvements from 0% to 4%. Probably the first results
were influenced by some other load on my machine, so I need to reset
expectations:
In detail ACE -6%, TAO -0%, Linux Kernel -5%, Firefox -0%.
I am happy with the numbers, anyways. I am changing CDT to use
CPreprocessor.
I'll keep Scanner2 around until the end of the year, but plan on
removing it,
to get started on stuff that depends on the preprocessor.
Markus.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. November 2007 16:13
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] CPreprocessor
> Importance: Low
>
> Hi,
> the performance tests for the indexer using the CPreprocessor went
> really good, I see an overall performance improvement of 5-10% (tested
> with ACE, TAO, Linux Kernel and Firefox).
>
> Given that I want to make the CPreprocessor the default rather sooner
> than later and support Scanner2 with -Dscanner=Scanner2 for a while.
> Does anyone object to that?
> Markus.
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=205272
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
