| RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0.1 Countdown |
|
Most of the CDT debug views and actions are based on
the standard debug model and it's extensions. My patches will make it
available for other models without implementing the standard model interfaces.
But I agree it is better to
wait for Ganymede. From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer Sent: 29 August 2007 20:06 To: CDT General developers list. Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0.1 Countdown I’m not sure changing
the debug model is appropriate for a maintenance release. Are there problems
that the patches are addressing? If not, I’d say wait until Ganymede opens up
which should happen no later than the 4.0.1 release I would
think. Doug Schaefer,
QNX Software
Systems From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail
Khodjaiants I think https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=197986 is
a serious bug. It was introduced by the patch from https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169548. I
would suggest to revert the patch and let the contributor to provide a
better solution. I have some
patches ready to make the CDT Debug components less dependent on
the standard debug model, but I am not sure if 4.0.1 is the
right version for it. Comments? Regards, Mikhail
K. From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. |