| RE: [cdt-dev] API change: fixing spelling bug in the New Project Model schema |
|
J. With all the great work you guys have been
doing, I didn’t feel like bringing this up. But there are a lot of
spelling mistakes in class names and method names in the build stuff too. We’ll
probably have to wait until we move to subversion before fixing the class name
ones anyway so we don’t lose tracability. Not a big deal, though…
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sennikovsky, Mikhail Hi all, We’ve recently found a spelling bug in the New Project
Model schema definition, namely the org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core.buildDefinitions
extension point schema now contains the ProjectType#buildArtefactType attribute. Also some Build Properties
definitions also contain the buildArtefactType in their ids See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=184239
for more detail. We would like to fix the “artEfact” spelling to be
“artIfact”. Besides fixing the spelling this would also ensure we have the same
spelling of the word “artifact” within the CDT J I would like to know if everyone is OK with this API change at this
stage. So please speak up if you have any concerns about this. Thanks, Mikhail |