[cdt-dev] API change: fixing spelling bug in the New Project Model schem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] API change: fixing spelling bug in the New Project Model schema

From: "Sennikovsky, Mikhail" <mikhail.sennikovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:50:55 +0400
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AceI0xOxmduuNP02RkquopOMDLIyrw==
Thread-topic: API change: fixing spelling bug in the New Project Model schema

Hi all,

We’ve recently found a spelling bug in the New Project Model schema definition, namely the

org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core.buildDefinitions extension point schema now contains the

ProjectType#buildArtefactType attribute. Also some Build Properties definitions also contain the buildArtefactType in their ids

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=184239 for more detail.

We would like to fix the “artEfact” spelling to be “artIfact”.

Besides fixing the spelling this would also ensure we have the same spelling of the word “artifact” within the CDT J

I would like to know if everyone is OK with this API change at this stage.

So please speak up if you have any concerns about this.

Thanks,

Mikhail

Prev by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] Summer of code : Seamless debugging between JDT and CDT
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Summer of code : Seamless debugging between JDT and CDT
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Summer of code : Seamless debugging between JDT and CDT
Next by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] API change: fixing spelling bug in the New Project Model schema
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top