Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] New Project model check-in

I guess I had mistakenly thought that there was going to be a vote, or a
meeting, or somesuch, and I must confess I did not read the meeting
minutes. In any case Mikhail V's email asked if anyone had objections... we
should give people a little time (end of the day?) to respond.

For my part, I've looked at the patch and I personally don't have any
objections to putting the patch in.  There are some open issues surrounding
language management that we'll have to resolve after the patch is in but I
don't think that those issues should hold it up.

===========================

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt



                                                                           
  From:   Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>                                
                                                                           
  To:     "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>             
                                                                           
  Date:   20/02/2007 11:25 AM                                              
                                                                           
  Subject RE: [cdt-dev] New Project model check-in                         
  :                                                                        
                                                                           




>From the minutes of the last call:

"The Project Model work will be held off until after M5. An updated patch
will be posted next week. If no vetoes, it can be committed as soon as M5
has been declared."

The patch has been updated a couple of times. I don't recall any vetoes. M5
is about to be declared any second. We can't afford to wait any longer.
Let's bite the bullet and get this done.

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:38 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] New Project model check-in
>
> I thought we were going to either have a review meeting for this or have
a
> vote?
>
> ===========================
>
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
> IBM Toronto
> http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
>
>
>
>
>   From:   Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>
>
>   To:     "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>   Date:   20/02/2007 10:15 AM
>
>   Subject RE: [cdt-dev] New Project model check-in
>   :
>
>
>
>
>
> Now would be the best time I would think.
>
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Voronin, Mikhail
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 5:35 AM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] New Project model check-in
> >
> > Doug, All,
> >
> > M5 is released and we are ready to check-in new project model
> > functionality.
> > It includes backwards compatibility for the current Core API. And all
> > current public core
> > API/extensions will remain working.
> >
> > Any objections for check-in of new project model code now?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mikhail Voronin.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev




Back to the top