Re: [cdt-dev] Refactoring Support for CDT

[Derek Morris <dmsubs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Doug,

By 'next years CDT' do you mean 2007 or 2008? i.e. CDT4.0 or 4.1?

--
Derek


Doug Schaefer wrote:
> I am 99% convinced next years CDT will be using 1.5. With 1.6 already out
> and 1.4 getting long in the tooth, I think it'll be time to move on.
>
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Emanuel Graf
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:24 AM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Refactoring Support for CDT
> >
> > Hi Doug
> > I had a look at the Europa milestone and RC dates and can understand
> > your concern about adding our work now.
> >
> > How are the chances that next year's CDT is using Java 1.5?
> >
> > Emanuel Graf
> >
> > Doug Schaefer wrote:
> > > Just a quick follow up to this. We're probably at the wrong point in the
> > CDT
> > > 4.0 lifecycle to go deeply into this. We can look at adding features
> > like
> > > this for next year's CDT. I am already worried about whether we'll be
> > able
> > > to make our current set of plan items.
> > >
> > > As well, CDT 4.0 will be Java 1.4 based. We've started down that path
> > and I
> > > think we've passed the point of no return.
> > >
> > > Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> > > Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev