[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Doug,
my experience is with subclipse from Tigris and I cannot say that I have found any fault with it concerning the basic functions of checkin / update / checkout.
- Creating tags and branches for multiple projects was always somewhat cumbersome until I took a few hours time to write my own tag-creating external tool. Wonder why it is done the way it is in subclipse, given that I was able to help myself in a few hours.
- Merge support is left open in the subversion basic implementation. Some support was added in the later versions of the subclipse feature, but I have never quite grasped the concept.
All this is, of course, rather client-specific, and I have not tried the Polarion stuff.
+ Working disconnected is better with subversion since you can do revert and compare with repository without actually accessing the server.
Still from my point of view the main point is that subversion plus WebDAV will make the repository access easier for all those who sit behind a restrictive firewall.
Greetings
Norbert
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Doug Schaefer
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 13:50
An: CDT General developers list.
Betreff: RE: [cdt-dev] Subversion
Thanks, for the great feedback. I'm with Chris on hating losing info on
rename. But I'm with Norbert and Mikhail on making sure we know what we're
getting into and to make sure Subversion is better, or at least isn't worse,
for every day activities.
BTW, Mikhail which client were you using. I've used Subversive from Polarion
(and apparently the winner of the Eclipse SVN project wars) and it seems
much better than Subclipse from Tigris. But then I've only used them to get
at source in repositories and haven't actually done real work with them.
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
