[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0 Plan
|
Very cool. Do you know the bug number with the patch in it? I can't see it
amongst the weeds.
Doug Schaefer
QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:45 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0 Plan
>
> It was for a "universal" binary. And yes, the platform already has x86
> support.
>
> ===========================
>
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
> IBM Toronto
> http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
>
>
>
>
> Doug Schaefer
> <DSchaefer@xxxxxx
> m> To
> Sent by: "CDT General developers list."
> cdt-dev-bounces@e <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> clipse.org cc
>
> Subject
> 24/10/2006 01:41 RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0 Plan
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> "CDT General
> developers list."
> <cdt-dev@eclipse.
> org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have much less fear and would be happy to apply the patch if someone
> promises to test a build that contains it.
>
> The one question that I do have is whether you are producing a "universal"
> binary which will run on both ppc and x86 or whether we need to have two
> different fragments. Does the Platform have x86 support already (I guess
> it
> must or you wouldn't have gotten that far).
>
> Doug Schaefer
> QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead
> http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:19 PM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0 Plan
> >
> > Re: MacOS X, there was a patch sumbitted to get the core fragments built
> > right to work on x86 or PPC, but the problem is that none of the
> > committers
> > really even have PPC hardware let alone x86. So, really no one is
> > prepared
> > to touch the patch just based on the fact that there is no way for
> anyone
> > to test it.
> >
> > ===========================
> >
> > Chris Recoskie
> > Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
> > IBM Toronto
> > http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Doug Schaefer
> > <DSchaefer@xxxxxx
> > m>
> To
> > Sent by: "CDT General developers list."
> > cdt-dev-bounces@e <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > clipse.org
> cc
> >
> >
> Subject
> > 24/10/2006 12:37 RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0 Plan
> > PM
> >
> >
> > Please respond to
> > "CDT General
> > developers list."
> > <cdt-dev@eclipse.
> > org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there a plan item and someone committed to making it happen? I do
> > recall
> > a bug being raised but I can?t remember what the resolution was.
> >
> > Doug Schaefer
> > QNX Software Systems
> > Eclipse CDT Project Lead
> > http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Craig Rasmussen
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:34 PM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 4.0 Plan
> >
> >
> > On Oct 24, 2006, at 10:15 AM, Chris Recoskie wrote:
> >
> >
> > You forgot AIX for the runtime platforms.
> >
> >
> > I think you should plan on including MacOSX x86 as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Craig
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
