RE: [cdt-dev] C/C++ identifier validation and internationalization

[Neeraj U Bhope <neerajbhope@xxxxxxxxxx>]

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/25/2006 08:11:11
PM:

> This was intentional.  Someone at IBM raised a defect that it
worked
> the opposite way -- so it was changed to allow the different 
> languages.  I cannot find the original defect but 70852, 70847,
and 
> 89853 all assume that the different languages are allowed.

Oks, thanks! Will take a look at them.
--
neeraj

>  
> I don't think that anybody else cares -- so it
can be done either 
> way.   The "correct" answer really depends upon what
the compiler 
> that you are using will accept.
>  
>     - Dave
> 
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Neeraj U Bhope
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 10:24 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] C/C++ identifier validation and internationalization

> 
> The class creation wizard accepts class names in different 
> languages. e.g. Arabic, German etc. It does not throw up any error
> since the CConventions.validateClassName goes through fine. Is this
> ok? In one the C++ standard working papers (http://www.open-std.
> org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/wp/html/oct97/) there is an annexure for 
> universal character names (http://www.open-std.
> org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/wp/html/oct97/extendid.html). So the 
> standards seems to have defined the support but what is the current
> level of support in different compilers and of course in CDT. Do the
> validations in CConventions go through "as designed" or
do they go 
> through accidentaly? :) 
> --
> neeraj_______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev