RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken

[Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>]

Setting the compliance level to 1.4 gives you the compile errors. You have
to manually set the source and classfile compliance to 1.4 to fix. I'm not
sure why the have it set up that way.

To ensure others don't get the compile error, you should probably set the
project properties to properly reflect the compliance level you are using
instead of relying on people to set their preferences correctly.

And, for now, don't set them to 5.0.

Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:57 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken

Hi,
I am the one that checked in the code containing the assert. It does
not require java 1.5, but it requires 1.4. 

Are you building with -source 1.3?
Markus.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Ryall
> Sent: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 21:21
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
> 
> Doug,
> 
> Like some of the other folks we've been assuming that the 
> platform would
> move to 1.5 and CDT would follow. We would really like to see 
> CDT 4.0 move
> to 1.5, both so we can use the new language features and to minimize
> operational problems. Everything else we are doing is using 
> 1.5 and we would
> like to stop having to step backward to 1.4 when working in 
> CDT or on code
> that we think might later be contributed to CDT.
> 
> I don't think requiring 1.5 a year from now is unreasonable.
> 
> Thanks - Ken
> 
> > From: ext Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:57:01 -0400
> > To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
> > 
> > Just talking to a couple of Platform people on 
> #eclipse-dev, there doesn't
> > seem to be a rush to move to 1.5 down there.
> > 
> > That doesn't prevent us as a community from deciding to 
> make the jump. But
> > we need to make sure we don't mess up anyone who can't move to 1.5.
> > 
> > So is there anyone who can't move? Or who want to make sure 
> that they can
> > keep running 1.4 in case it turns out they can't move?
> > 
> > I have no preference either way.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev