Re: [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1

From: Matthew Ballance <matt.ballance@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:33:17 -0800
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CrDD/2yuhqD6x9vn6LyeQlNcauWR4sdCwGNvZbeoZL9ZSx5qvOTY4I3tauihM8GrcItqQrLLYY+Moow4FWQZmQyg1kD/P6pvo7xj941bFPd43vb6plcShBMZnYdUnVbxZHa18D15+FksCIcpCL86Ju9vBsnXM8PldsRFDqeGzlM=
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

What justification did the JDT team use in requiring JRE 1.5?

Just curious...

On 12/13/05, Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey gang, this topic came up at the Eclipse Architecture Council meetings. Apparently the JDT in Eclipse 3.1 requires JRE 1.5. The rest of the platform will be JRE 1.4. I know we at QNX have a requirement to stay on 1.4. Does anyone have a strong need to move to 1.5 or can I declare that the CDT will be 1.4 also. BTW most of the projects are also staying on 1.4 (not to invoke peer pressure J).

Doug

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

References:
- [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1
Next by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1
Next by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] JVM Version for CDT 3.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs