[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Fall Conference
|
No more BOFs running until after 11 PM though, unless QNX has a liquor
license :-P
___________________________________________
Chris Recoskie
Software Designer
IDE Frameworks Group
Texas Instruments, Toronto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Treggiari, Leo
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:31 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Fall Conference
>
> > Once we have agreed on that, though, there are lots of longer term
> > things to consider, and the conference is the ideal place to discuss
> > them. We could continue this discussion in the evening if the
> > conference slot is not enough time to cover everything.
>
> Reminds me of fond memories of EclipseCon 2005, where the CDT evening
> BOFs were the best part!
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Overbey
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:15 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Fall Conference
>
> > I guess how much time it will take also depends upon the goal of the
> > discussion. For example, will the goal of the discussion be to
agree
> to
> > changes and who will do them in what timeframe?
>
>
> Photran 3.0 includes a "patched" CDT, where we have replaced C and C++
> project types with generic Make project types and integrated an
> extension point into the Core for adding additional languages. We
would
>
> really, really like to have these integrated into the "real" CDT so we
> don't have to make our own.
>
> So I think our primary goal for the conference is to get our existing
> changes into the CDT.
>
> Once we have agreed on that, though, there are lots of longer term
> things to consider, and the conference is the ideal place to discuss
> them. We could continue this discussion in the evening if the
> conference slot is not enough time to cover everything.
>
> >I don't remember seeing this mentioned explicitly, but I assume
people
> >are also interested in multiple language support in a single project.
> >That is mixing any combination of C, C++, Fortran, and other
languages
> >in the same project. Are the Photran talks going to raise this
> >requirement?
> >
> >
>
> We don't believe it is necessary to have separate project types for
each
>
> CDT language. With our current strategy (generic Make Projects),
there
> is no problem with having C/C++ and Fortran in the same project.
> They're not exceptionally well-integrated with each other, but they're
> both there.
>
> Basically, it's more of a solution than a requirement.
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
