[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
|
Good suggestion, Doug...
On a related note, does anyone have feedback on the updates Alain/Mikhail
did to the debug code last week (to address the problem with registers
displays with different stackframes). Has anyone had a chance to rerun their
debug tests to exercise this fully? We might want to wait until we get
thumbs-up on this before respinning another RC.
Thanks,
Sebastien
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:48 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
>
> Sennikovsky, Mikhail wrote:
>
> >Ok, I have applied the proposed patch.
> >The bug is fixed...
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Mikhail
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >On Behalf Of Alain Magloire
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 8:58 PM
> >To: CDT General developers list.
> >Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
> >
> >
> >+1
> >
> >You may want to do this asap, Doug is planning a rebuild.
> >
> >
> >
>
> I'm following the conversation and am holding off until the
> dust settles.
>
> Cheers,
> Doug
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>
> >>
> >On
> >
> >
> >>Behalf Of Recoskie, Chris
> >>Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:55 AM
> >>To: CDT General developers list.
> >>Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
> >>
> >>+1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>___________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Chris Recoskie
> >>
> >>Software Designer
> >>
> >>IDE Frameworks Group
> >>
> >>Texas Instruments, Toronto
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>________________________________
> >>
> >>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>
> >>
> >On
> >
> >
> >>Behalf Of Sennikovsky, Mikhail
> >>Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 8:29 AM
> >>To: CDT General developers list.
> >>Subject: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>There is one more bug reported yesterday related to MBS
> functionality.
> >>Bug#: 105754
> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=105754> .
> >>
> >>If a build artifact extension is changed from the default value,
> >>
> >>
> >libraries
> >
> >
> >>and user-specified objects that are to be included while linking the
> >>
> >>
> >build
> >
> >
> >>artifact are ignored.
> >>
> >>I've got an easy minor risk fix for this which I attached as a patch
> >>
> >>
> >for
> >
> >
> >>this bugzilla.
> >>
> >>I propose fixing this for the 3.0 and would like to here others
> >>
> >>
> >opinion.
> >
> >
> >>Any comments/objections?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Thank you,
> >>
> >>Mikhail
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdt-dev mailing list
> >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdt-dev mailing list
> >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Doug Schaefer, Senior Software Developer IBM Rational
> Software, Ottawa Lab Kanata, Ontario, Canada
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
