[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
|
+1
You may want to do this asap, Doug is planning a rebuild.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Recoskie, Chris
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:55 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
>
> +1
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________
>
>
>
> Chris Recoskie
>
> Software Designer
>
> IDE Frameworks Group
>
> Texas Instruments, Toronto
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Sennikovsky, Mikhail
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 8:29 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> There is one more bug reported yesterday related to MBS functionality.
> Bug#: 105754 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=105754> .
>
> If a build artifact extension is changed from the default value, libraries
> and user-specified objects that are to be included while linking the build
> artifact are ignored.
>
> I've got an easy minor risk fix for this which I attached as a patch for
> this bugzilla.
>
> I propose fixing this for the 3.0 and would like to here others opinion.
>
> Any comments/objections?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mikhail
>
>
>
>
>
>
