FYI; Thanks, Sebastien, I have updated
the copyrights.
Leo
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sebastien Marineau
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 5:09
PM
To: CDT
General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev]
Documentation page copyrights
Hi Leo,
I can get a formal opinion on this
(Eclipse has lawyers on staff), however here's my take on it:
1. If the doc page was updated with
significant content (e.g. actual new IP as opposed to minor edits like
spelling, punctuation etc), then the year 2005 should be added.
2. For pages where the content is
generated by you/Intel (as opposed to derivative works of the original IBM
docs), then you should mark them as copyright "Intel Corp and others"
If any pages contain significant content
from both IBM and Intel, then you could mark them as "Copyright IBM
Corporation 2000,2004, Copyright Intel Corp 2005"...
Hope this makes sense,
Sebastien
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Treggiari,
Leo
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:29
PM
To: CDT
General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Documentation
page copyrights
There are 2 loose ends that I have. Here’s the
first:
In the CDT user documentation, most/all of the individual
pages contain at the bottom:
“Copyright IBM Corporation and others, 2000,
2004.”
Some also contain:
“Copyright Red Hat 2003, 2004”
I have 2 questions:
1. Do the copyrights need to be updated to 2005?
2. I’ve been adding new pages and just copying the IBM
copyright “pointer”. Should I go back and make those pages:
“Copyright Intel Corporation and others, 2005”?
Thanks,
Leo