[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT-2.1 life cycle
|
Hi Alain,
Intel would likely use a 2.1.1 if it were produced, but as to whether we
think the release is necessary, would depend upon the bugs that were
decided to be fixed.
Regards,
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alain Magloire
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 4:09 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT-2.1 life cycle
Bonjour,
Last conf. call, I suggested the possibility to have a 2.1.1,
the reactions were not very enthusiast ...
Probably, Most participants want to concentrate efforts/resources to get
CDT-3.0 ready ...
So before going to the motions of bugzilla entries, PR scrubing, build
candidates etc ...,
lets make it clear there is a desire for this .. with some {+1, 0, -1}
votes.
It folks would prefer we go full steam toward 3.0 that's fine, too.
--
au revoir, alain
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
