[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT-2.1 life cycle
|
Well, from our perspective, we do not have product requirements for 2.1.
We have 2.0.x in our current release stream and will be using 3.0.x in the
next. From that angle, we're a 0.
However, if the bugs are severe enough to cause negative feelings with the
open source customers of the CDT, then I'd say +1. I guess that depends on
the list you put together :-)
Doug Schaefer
Ottawa Lab, IBM Rational Software Division
"Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/13/2005 04:08 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[cdt-dev] CDT-2.1 life cycle
Bonjour,
Last conf. call, I suggested the possibility to have a 2.1.1,
the reactions were not very enthusiast ...
Probably, Most participants want to concentrate efforts/resources to get
CDT-3.0 ready ...
So before going to the motions of bugzilla entries, PR scrubing, build
candidates etc ...,
lets make it clear there is a desire for this .. with some {+1, 0, -1}
votes.
It folks would prefer we go full steam toward 3.0 that's fine, too.
--
au revoir, alain
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
