AW: AW: Indexer (was Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 new features)

["Kaiser, Volker" <volker.kaiser@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for the answer. 
Since my team and me are just about to decide over a new IDE, could you give a rough estimation when the new parser will be available? 
Volker 
	-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
	Von: John Camelon [mailto:jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx]
	Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Dezember 2004 15:26
	An: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
	Betreff: Re: AW: Indexer (was Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 new features)
	
	
	FYI, our new source code parsers properly handle arbitrarily deep pointer to members & pointer to functions. This shouldn't be a problem in future releases. 
	
	JohnC
	www.eclipse.org/cdt 
	
	cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 12/01/2004 03:23:01 AM:
	
	> One main problem I had with the Indexer is that it does not recognise
	> typedefs of pointer-to-member-functions
	> 
	> example A.h :
	> 
	> 1: class A 
	> 2: {
	> 3: public:
	> 4: typedef void (A::*ptom)(int);
	> 5: };
	> 6: 
	> 7: typedef A::ptom PTOM; // <- Indexer: "Attempt to use symbol 
	> failed : ptom .."
	> 
	> Moreover, if a C++ member function has i.e. PTOM as return value then
	> the content assist doesn't work within the definition of the function.
	> 
	> example A.cpp :
	> 
	> 1: PTOM A::func() // <- Indexer: "Attempt to use symbol failed : PTOM .."
	> 2: {
	> 3: // content assist does not work in here
	> 4: }
	> 5:
	> 6: int A::func2()
	> 7: {
	> 8: // code completion works fine (except function pointers)
	> 9: }
	> 
	> I work with Eclipse 3.0.1 and CDT 2.1 RC3.
	> Sorry for disturbance but I did not get an answer on the eclipse.
	> tools.cdt mailing list
	> 
	> Volker Kaiser
	> 
	> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
	> Von: Leon Pollak [mailto:leonp@xxxxxxxxx]
	> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2004 16:37
	> An: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
	> Betreff: Indexer (was Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 new features)
	> 
	> 
	> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 16:43, John Camelon wrote:
	> > Please forgive us if we do not remember what your exact concerns regarding
	> > the indexer are.
	> > We are looking at addressing common concerns regarding correctness,
	> > performance and scalability.
	> > Let us know specifically what shortcomings you believe should be
	> > addressed.
	> Thanks a lot for the answer.
	> 
	> Some time ago (about 3-4 months) I posted some questions about the indexer 
	> behavior (or better to say not behavior :-)) and was told that these are 
	> known issues which will be treated.
	> 
	> it does not find almost anything in my even C code (already not 
	> speaking about 
	> C++). 
	> 
	> More specific. For example, C code with functions been called from one file, 
	> while function declaration is in another - always causes "the operation is 
	> unavailable on the current selection". 
	> 
	> This also happens even in the case when the tool tip shows, for example, 
	> structure declaration from the same *.c file, but F3 button does nothing, 
	> except error message in the status bar.
	> 
	> Well, actually, I checked this again and there was no one case when the F3 
	> button gave me something except red error message.
	> 
	> May be something is wrong in my RH9+GTK installation?
	> 
	> I did not wanted to disturb people and simply waited for some movement on the 
	> list...:-))
	> 
	> Thanks.
	> -- 
	> Leon M.Pollak
	> leonp at plris dot com
	> 
	> _______________________________________________
	> cdt-dev mailing list
	> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
	> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
	> _______________________________________________
	> cdt-dev mailing list
	> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
	> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev