[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] cdt_21 Branch Split
|
Of course, things are never simple. It turns out that gcc is pretty strict
with C code. In this case we get burned for using UNICODE in our C files.
C doesn't define wchar_t or L strings. Porting this to gcc will require
making the files C++ and making sure the JNI code is hooked up correctly.
This may take a little longer than I hoped.
Doug Schaefer, IBM's Technical Lead, Eclipse CDT
Ottawa Lab, IBM Canada, Rational Software Division
Chris Wiebe <cwiebe@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/17/2004 02:06 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] cdt_21 Branch Split
Yeah, it would also be nice to get rid of the requirement to have VS
installed in order to build the dll.
Doug, maybe this will help:
http://www.mingw.org/mingwfaq.shtml#faq-jni-dll
Good luck
-Chris
Douglas Schaefer wrote:
> Uh, oh. One of the problems with building with VS.Net is dependencies on
> the VS.Net run-time (i.e. Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Version 7.1,
> MSVCR71.dll). Check your build settings to make sure you aren't using
> anything fancy. I'll also take MinGW to it and see if that'll work
better,
> it only depends on MSVCRT.dll which everyone should have.
>
> Doug Schaefer, IBM's Technical Lead, Eclipse CDT
> Ottawa Lab, IBM Canada, Rational Software Division
>
>
>
> "Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
> Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 11/17/2004 01:44 PM
> Please respond to
> cdt-dev
>
>
> To
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [cdt-dev] cdt_21 Branch Split
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>The branch has been split. Please do all CDT 2.1. work on the cdt_21
>>branch. HEAD may how proceed with 3.0 activities.
>>
>
>
> ho well!! Cancel my last 8-)
> did not finish the queue of email yet,
> maybe I should order my emails to be recent on top.
>
> Question: do you have problem with the recent libspwaner.dll on windows.
> Some folks are reporting a library missing MSVRC71.dll or something?
>
> Thanks, for the branching.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
