RE: [cdt-dev] cdt_21 Branch Split

[Douglas Schaefer <dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Leo,

It somewhat depends on whether the underlying source code is different 
between HEAD and 2.1. If they are different, then yes you will need to 
send two patches. If they are the same, then you should be able to get 
away with just one.

Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, IBM's Technical Lead, Eclipse CDT
Ottawa Lab, IBM Canada, Rational Software Division



"Treggiari, Leo" <leo.treggiari@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/17/2004 11:31 AM
Please respond to
cdt-dev


To
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] cdt_21 Branch Split






I'm back in "real-time" mode!  I have a patch process question.  After
the split, when I submit a patch for both 2.1 and HEAD, and the files to
be patched in 2.1 and HEAD are still the same, do I need to submit one
set of patch files to be applied to both the 2.1 branch and HEAD, or 2
sets of patch files?

Thanks,
Leo

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Douglas Schaefer
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:03 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] cdt_21 Branch Split

Hey all,

Today being Wednesday, we agreed (I think) to split off the branch for
CDT 
2.1 and to allow CDT 3.0 development to commence in HEAD.

I'd like to pick a time, speaking of real-time communications, to do
this. 
How's about 1 p.m. EST (or whenever I get back from lunch). If you'd
like 
more time, please let us know.

Thanks,
Doug Schaefer, IBM's Technical Lead, Eclipse CDT
Ottawa Lab, IBM Canada, Rational Software Division
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev