Next Wednesday sounds OK to me too.
Leo
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Sean Evoy
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004
3:45 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] When should
we cut the 2.1 branch?
+1
Wednesday
would be my preference too (running from John now)
Sean
Evoy
Rational Software - IBM Software Group
Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
|
"Alain Magloire"
<alain@xxxxxxx>
Sent
by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/11/2004 01:36 PM
|
Please
respond to
cdt-dev
|
|
|
To
|
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [cdt-dev] When should we cut the 2.1
branch?
|
|
>
> There are a bunch of us here @ IBM Canada
that seriously want to muck up
> CVS HEAD for CDT 3.0.
> As of the current tally, we have still ~130
bugs open on 2.1.
> QNX, Intel : When would you feel comfortable
cutting a branch for 2.1?
My preference is, next wednesday (17 nov), for the
cutting date.
For now we need the few remaining days to evaluate
the
rest of the PR(fixing what we can).
Note: Some of the PRs reporter did take
advantage by moving
the Target Milestone to 2.1 or flipping the
priority to "bloker" 8-)
That's fair game, a PR maybe of importance for a
user/ISV, if you do,
then please, play along by providing the necessary
feedbacks, PR's are
not write only.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
