Re: [cdt-dev] Parser question

[John Camelon <jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Is this feature something that will
be delivered as part of CDT 2.1? 
Parser is technically an internal class
... 

JohnC
www.eclipse.org/cdt

cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/08/2004 11:41:33
AM:

> Thanks a lot!
> 
> John Camelon wrote:
> 
> >Parser is no longer final.   
> >
> >Thanks, 
> >JohnC
> >www.eclipse.org/cdt 
> >
> >cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/08/2004 10:56:03 AM:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>It does not allow now, just allowed :-). I need to break code
to 
> >>separate elements like CompleteParser did, but on the other
hand, I
> >>    
> >>
> >need 
> >  
> >
> >>all preprocessor directives and unknown types exceptions to
be
> >>    
> >>
> >ignored. 
> >  
> >
> >>For formatter any code is just a text, combined from semantic
> >>constructions. Having this element tree (almost like AST tree),
> >>formatter can reconstruct source code based on custom rules.
Parser + 
> >>scanner don't do this job now, but they have almost everything
to do
> >>    
> >>
> >it. 
> >  
> >
> >>That's why I'm trying to subclass them to get necessary functionality.
> >>
> >>Alex Chapiro
> >>
> >>John Camelon wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>The extension mechanism has not yet been completely formalized.
  
> >>>How does subclassing the parser allow you to format code?
> >>>
> >>>JohnC
> >>>www.eclipse.org/cdt 
> >>>
> >>>cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/08/2004 10:00:27
AM:
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Working on default C/C++ formatter, I'm trying to
override the
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >default
> >  
> >
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>implementation of  IASTFactoryExtension interface
to substitute 
> >>>>createSimpleTypeSpecifier and
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >overrideCreateSimpleTypeSpecifierMethod
> >  
> >
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>methods. To do it before, I inherited from Parser
class and replaced
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>>extensionFactory member ( I didn't like it, but it
worked at least).
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>>Parser is not inheritable now (a final class) and
I cannot do it any
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>>more. Is there any legal way for substitution of default
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>implementation 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>of IASTFactoryExtension interface?
> >>>>
> >>>>Alex Chapiro
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>cdt-dev mailing list
> >>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev