[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] New generated makefile pattern
|
Of course ... that being said, it is an "unclean" approach and we are well
aware of it (and its potentially confusing) consequences) =;-)
It was however expeditious for our needs and could conceivably be something
that someone wants to with the new separation so it should be included for
consideration.
Thanks,
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Chapiro [mailto:achapiro37@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:30 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] New generated makefile pattern
>
>
> Eclipse API permits to do it for any IFile object. As long as
> Eclipe is
> portable, you can do it in any OS Eclipse is able to run.
>
> Recoskie, Chris wrote:
>
> >Can you can hijack a file that way in a ClearCase dynamic
> view on UNIX
> >though? I'm thinking MVFS won't let you...
> >
> >Time for me to shut up and let the Rational guys handle this one
> >methinks.
> >
> >:-)
> >
> >___________________________________________
> >
> >Chris Recoskie
> >Software Designer
> >IDE Frameworks Group
> >Texas Instruments, Toronto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>Behalf Of Alex Chapiro
> >>Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:18 PM
> >>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] New generated makefile pattern
> >>
> >>StarTeam is another example (one of our major customers uses it). We
> >>just set read-only flag off at the moment of touching, then restore
> >>
> >>
> >it.
> >
> >
> >>Not necessary to do it with CVS.
> >>
> >>Douglas Schaefer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Ouch. How would that work in a scenario where you do not have write
> >>>permission to the files that have to be built, e.g., in a ClearCase
> >>>dynamic view?
> >>>
> >>>Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
> >>>Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Alex Chapiro <achapiro@xxxxxxx>
> >>>Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>05/19/2004 04:28 PM
> >>>Please respond to
> >>>cdt-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>To
> >>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>cc
> >>>
> >>>Subject
> >>>Re: [cdt-dev] New generated makefile pattern
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Sean Evoy wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Chris,
> >>>>There are two basic extension I am thinking about; a makefile
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >generator
> >
> >
> >>>>that you can supply in the toolchain, and dependency calculators
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >that
> >
> >
> >>>>you can supply with a tool. They have to interact to get the deps
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>right.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Optionally they can avoid interaction, as in our implementation of
> >>>dependency checker which just touches files that has to be rebuild
> >>>
> >>>
> >and
> >
> >
> >>>relies on the standard make dependency checking rules.
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>cdt-dev mailing list
> >>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdt-dev mailing list
> >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
