RE: [cdt-dev] Please move C++ Class Browser to committed on the C DT 2.0

[Thomas Fletcher <ThomasF@xxxxxxx>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kleanthis Hapitas [mailto:khapitas@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:23 PM
>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Please move C++ Class Browser to committed on the
CDT 2.0 plan
>
>Good to hear Thomas! 
>
>Are you guys planning to produce any documentation (feature description,
design doc, 
>whatever) that would help us better understand what it is you are planning
to do on this 
>item? 

TF NOTE:
 Yes .. we are just getting started and I've pointed the developer to some
of the existing documents and feature descriptions so that we can follow
in kind.

> On a related note, I have broken another plan item (Eclipse 3.0 support)
into two - one to > cover compatibility with the Eclipse 3.0 release (fixing
things like emacs key bindings) 
> and one to cover support for some of the new capabilities that we could
(should?) take 
> advantage of in the 3.0 framework. The compatibility item has been moved
to committed 
> (that's a no-brainer), but the 3.0 enhancements is still proposed. You had
volunteered a 
> little while ago to put together a list of such enhancements based on the
reported 
> features and functionality from Eclipse 2.0 ----> Eclipse 3.0 M*. I think
such a list 
> would be extremely helpful. Who knows, it might even spur some action :-) 

Yup, John C. pinged me about it last week.  We figured I'd put the entries
into BugZilla and then as I get entries I can forward them to the list 
and they can go up as "uncommitted items".

Try and get a few things put together for this weekend.

Thanks,
 Thomas



Thomas Fletcher <ThomasF@xxxxxxx> 
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
11/28/2003 10:16 AM Please respond to
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To"'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
ccChris Wiebe <cwiebe@xxxxxxx> 
Subject[cdt-dev] Please move C++ Class Browser to committed on the CDT 2.0
plan







I'd like to also move the C++ Class Browser/C++ Hierarchy View 
(https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=47441) to the committed state

on the CDT 2.0 plan. 
  
QNX has assigned and committed the resources to work on this item. 
  
Thanks, 
  Thomas