Hi Everyone,
I pushed up to the CBI repositories the modifications to have the
packaging repository use tycho. You can git clone it with:
git clone
git://git.eclipse.org/gitroot/cbi/org.eclipse.epp.packages.git
git checkout Juno_M6
There was 2 packages I was not able to successsfull build however
the cpp and parallel packages. The both failed due
to missing requirement for org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpm.ui.editor.feature_0.0.0.
I'm not sure why this is but I left them commented out in the parent
pom file for now.
Thanh
On 03/27/2012 10:56 AM, Markus Knauer wrote:
The historical development is different: it's not a
merge in the Git repository, it has been always like this in EPP
because Buckminster is able to use this layout for the packages.
Now it would be interesting to know *why* Igor chose a different
layout. Maybe he was running into the same problem that you are
mentioning below.
Buckminster uses a top-level feature (aka 'allpackages') which
references all the package features. Each package feature contains
a .product file and references a branding plug-in. That's why we
need only two projects per package: One feature (including the
.product file) and one plug-in project.
If I remember it correctly, Igor's approach had separated the
.product file from the feature.
Markus
|
