Re: [buckminster-dev] Action output?

[kenneth@xxxxxxxxx]

> So what if we just strip off all fancy stuff that I proposed originally
> and just keep a --output command line option to perform? It would then
> map to the predefined property 'buckminster.output' for all actions. It
> may of course be ignored too, that's up to the actor implementation but
> we would establish a little more then just a convention and it would be
> a bit more user-friendly.

Yup, sounds good. It's a simple and no-nonsense 'shortcut'. We still  
need the '--definefile' stuff also for persistence of a set of props,  
and somehow we'd need to include this prop in that set. Obviously can  
be as simple as just allowing usage of the 'buckminster.output' prop  
name...

ken1