[babel-dev] Deployed R_0_200812081524, should we run syncup again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[babel-dev] Deployed R_0_200812081524, should we run syncup again?

From: Denis Roy <denis.roy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:35:48 -0500
Delivered-to: babel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/babel-dev>
List-help: <mailto:babel-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-dev>, <mailto:babel-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-dev>, <mailto:babel-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081105)

Team,

I've tagged and deployed R_0_200812081524.  All seems well.

Also, now that the Adobe contribution is in the database, should weconsider running the syncup script to perhaps copy the translations toother projects?


Thanks,

Denis


--
Denis Roy
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.  --  http://www.eclipse.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [babel-dev] Deployed R_0_200812081524, should we run syncup again?
  - From: Antoine Toulme

Prev by Date: [babel-dev] Plan
Next by Date: Re: [babel-dev] Deployed R_0_200812081524, should we run syncup again?
Previous by thread: [babel-dev] Plan
Next by thread: Re: [babel-dev] Deployed R_0_200812081524, should we run syncup again?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs