Re: FW: [Fwd: Re: [atf-dev] JavaXPCOM ownership]

[Jacek Pospychala <jacek.p@xxxxxxxx>]

Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> The JavaXPCOM bridge would not be an XULRunner extension, it would be a
> binary (DLL) which embeds XULRunner (launches and controls it). Therefore
> the standard XULRunner extension packaging doesn't apply, and you can put
> the DLL wherever it is convenient to do so in Eclipse.
>   

To follow up on this,
I guess we reached some quiet consensus here. That is nobody has 
anything better to offer :-)
Benjamin, if you open (or if there's already) a bug for removing 
JavaXPCOM from XULRunner/repackaging it to separate dll, please CC me.
I'll try my best to help there however currently I'm tough on time which 
stops me from helping in any way now.

thanks!

Jacek