[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [atf-dev] org.mozilla.xulrunner plugin dependency
|
Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Max, Sergey :
Could you check if the new proposed Xulrunner extension makes sense for
you?
This was in an earlier message
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/atf-dev/msg00339.html
That would be cool, since you came with thre request originally.
Cordially
Philippe
-----Original Message-----
From: atf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:atf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sergey Vasilyev
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:08 AM
To: atf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Max Rydahl Andersen
Subject: [atf-dev] org.mozilla.xulrunner plugin dependency
Hello!
Pleased to meet all of you. And I would like to say thank you
for your
perfect job.
I'm a member of JBoss Tools group and I'm working for RHDS/JBossTools
project. We would like to use org.mozilla.xulrunner plugin in our
project. Because of the fact, I have a question. Is it possible to
extract the dependency on org.eclipse.atf.mozilla.ide.core
plugin from
org.mozilla.xulrunner plugin. Or at least to give resolution
"optional"
to this dependency?
Best regards, Sergey.
_______________________________________________
atf-dev mailing list
atf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/atf-dev
Hello, Philippe!
Yes, it is works for us fine. Thank you.
I have only one notice. In my opinion it is makes sense to have
"org.mozilla.xulrunner" as a bundle symbolic name instead of
"org.mozilla.xulrunner.WS.OS.ARCH" because of we already have the
platform filters (e.g. Eclipse-PlatformFilter: (& (osgi.ws=win32)
(osgi.os=win32) (osgi.arch=x86) )).
Best regards, Sergey.
