[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] IDE support for 'privileged' modifier
|
- From: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:35 +0200
- Delivered-to: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A32hRQ4LTE8CT90jc8Bl1ZJJINmOkCTq1Buzt4LOQtw=; b=tym2rPtBi3Fev5FdEjZ0LNj7HK3wVH90O6Ph5IQ4fG1gvnBIJXtinlXHo2PzYxamxQ ILgCXAmgHFgD7zi6e7Hdd+ePe7XOrKro45Z5XUuJ8Lmhvl+qBZu71wKnrmOkJsk5RvHw LXUYWMTDbacP6xWEcS3SBpP2hvLjv+IrC1onU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=JSEO99lbmcyeG77gBDKiUC+Oex13XKsRpl+80YxcY8huPNO1IufRnmQG1JQbqiC0au nEFmFkvmc7Q+WO3NXwsGwNzv1Dbm6by08amdO5qqu2Wxxy/Qi0NN3q47LUR3wm9Ni9x7 ys/dHWevrHuDc9uvuJoEPt52DjH5PdXjdCoYA=
Thanks for that. We don't actually have any unit tests for the new
aspect wizard, so this may not have been working for some time now.
I raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=345883 to track this.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Brett Randall <javabrett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I enabled AspectJ tooling on a project in Eclipse, then I needed to
> create a new Aspect with 'privileged' modifier. I think I notice two
> things:
>
> 1) Checking the 'privileged' modifier checkbox in the new aspect
> wizard didn't result in the privileged keyword/modifier in my new
> Aspect file.
> 2) When I went to add it in the editor, it wasn't supported as a
> content assist editor suggestion after typing p-CTRL-SPACE.
>
> For 2) I found [1], but I accept that content-assist won't find
> private methods, but I thought it might offer the actual keyword in
> the aspect declaration.
>
> Anyone else confirm these, are they unreported to-date?
>
> Plugin-spy data:
>
> The active wizard class:
> NewAspectCreationWizard
> The contributing plug-in:
> org.eclipse.ajdt.ui (2.1.3.e36x-20110315-1000)
>
> The active page class:
> NewAspectWizardPage
> The contributing plug-in:
> org.eclipse.ajdt.ui (2.1.3.e36x-20110315-1000)
>
> The active editor class:
> AspectJEditor
> The contributing plug-in:
> org.eclipse.ajdt.ui (2.1.3.e36x-20110315-1000)
> The active editor identifier:
> org.eclipse.ajdt.internal.ui.editor.CompilationUnitEditor
> The active menu contribution identifiers:
> org.eclipse.ajdt.internal.ui.editor.CompilationUnitEditor.EditorContext
> #AbstractTextEditorContext
> #CompilationUnitEditorContext
> #AbstractTextEditorRulerContext
> #AJCompilationUnitRulerContext
> org.eclipse.ajdt.internal.ui.editor.CompilationUnitEditor.RulerContext
> #OverviewRulerContext
>
>
> Cheers
> Brett
>
> [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=263556
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>