public class X {
private Y y1;
private Y y2;
public Y getY1() {
return y1;
}
public void setY1(Y y) {
this.y1 = y;
}
public Y getY2() {
return y2;
}
public void setY2(Y y) {
this.y2 = y;
}
}
Nothing special for class Y.
I have an aspect like this which is OK, but access() point cut
does not capture anything. Fine.
public aspect OneToOneAspect {
pointcut access() : execution(Y X.a*());
after() : access() {
System.out.println("Access");
}
}
But, if I add similar method signature like Y X.a*() but for declare @method, I had compilation error:
[error] The method 'public com.arizal.business.Y com.arizal.business.X.a*()' does not
exist
The aspect after declare addition is the following:
public aspect OneToOneAspect {
declare @method : public Y X.a*(): @OneToOneAccessor;
pointcut access() : execution(Y X.a*());
after() : access() {
System.out.println("Access");
}
}
Why the pointcut definition does not throw error while the
declare method does ? Is it expected ?
I would prefer to have compilation error in both cases. Is it possible ?
Cheers,
Anwar .
