Re: [aspectj-users] Compiler problem when building with Maven

[Dave Whittaker <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think this will do it.  I haven't used the Maven AJ plugin for a  
while, but in the past I've used specific dependencies for the plugin  
itself to override the version of the compiler it used.  This is from  
an old POM of mine:


			<plugin>
				<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
				<artifactId>aspectj-maven-plugin</artifactId>
				<dependencies>
				<dependency>
					<groupId>aspectj</groupId>
					<artifactId>aspectjrt</artifactId>
					<version>1.6.1</version>
				</dependency>
				<dependency>
					<groupId>aspectj</groupId>
					<artifactId>aspectjtools</artifactId>
					<version>1.6.1</version>
				</dependency>
				</dependencies>
				<executions>
					<execution>
						<goals>
							<goal>compile</goal>
							<goal>test-compile</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>
				</executions>
				<configuration>
					<showWeaveInfo>true</showWeaveInfo>
					<verbose>true</verbose>
					<complianceLevel>1.5</complianceLevel>
					<source>1.5</source>
					<target>1.5</target>
				</configuration>
			</plugin>

Obviously you would have to change the groupId/artifactId/version as  
necessary.

On Nov 10, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Andy Clement wrote:

> ah... that may leave me a little out of my depth, I'm no maven expert.
> Hopefully someone who knows about these things can chip in -
> Simoooooooooone? :)
>
> Andy
>
> 2009/11/10 prg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <prg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Andy Clement schrieb:
> > > I guess you probably half suspect what I'm going to say :)
> >
> > :-D
> >
> > > I see you are on AspectJ1.6.5 - can you upgrade?  The problem in the
> > > original attachment is due to 'P' signatures (an internal optimized
> > > type of signature we use) leaking out into the class files we  
> > > create.
> > > There were one or two bugs fixed related to those during 1.6.6
> > > development (eg. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi? 
> > > id=284297
> > > - slightly different manifestation but the same underlying issue).
> >
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > indeed I'd absolutely *love* to upgrade, but our capabilities are
> > somewhat limited,  so to say  ;-)
> >
> > We're already using org.codehaus.mojo:aspectj-maven-plugin:1.3- 
> > SNAPSHOT
> > Which seems to be the latest we can get, am I right? Or is there any
> > possibility to get a more recent compiler version there?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Hermann
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users