[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
AW: [aspectj-users] Overall problem with AJDT performance
|
- From: Thomas Hofmann <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:35:02 +0200
- Accept-language: en-US, de-DE
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
- Delivered-to: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
- Thread-index: AcpKAthiX/FKjpnCRKipu6WUmFySxQAZAar7
- Thread-topic: [aspectj-users] Overall problem with AJDT performance
Hi Andy,
I would be willing to put together some profiling infos as I'm not able to provide you my complete workspace. I will install the yourkit trial. Maybe you can point me to some infos on what exactly needs to be in the profiling infos to record. Do I need to use a special version so that you can read the results? Can the results be interchanged at all?
I have a second question. Would it be possible to backport the changes to the eclipse 3.2.x compatible branch?
Thomas
----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Oktober 2009 01:39
An: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: [aspectj-users] Overall problem with AJDT performance
Hey,
Andrew will look at the AJDT problems I'm sure. I'll do a bit more
testing on the change I made in zip 3 and probably commit it. I'm
pleased we have managed to make a difference here. If you want us to
take it further then we can try, but it'll be trickier without a
proper profile showing where your particular scenario is spending its
time. I can do some analysis of this() matching but without a similar
set of hierarchies to what you have as my test program, it may be hard
to spot any problems.
cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users