Re: [aspectj-users] Program compiles fine with AJDT, fails with iajc ant

["Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@xxxxxxxxx>]

Done: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=244497
I attached a minimal Eclipse project that shows the error (try to use
the included build.xml).

Regards,
g

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Clearly something is not right if you get different results in AJDT and
> outside AJDT for the same codebase.  Can you turn pipeline compilation off
> in both cases and see if that at least makes behaviour consistent?  I think
> you should raise a bug for the inconsistency and we'll look at it.
>
> I have fixed bugs vaguely in this area but that was a few months ago so the
> fixes should be in both the AJDT and AspectJ you are using.
>
> I tried recreating your problem in a small example and it behaves fine for
> me, so if you are able to distill it to a small program that fails and
> attach that to the testcase, that will help immensely.
>
> cheers,
> Andy.
>
> 2008/8/18 Guillaume Pothier <gpothier@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I used Eclipse 3.4/AJDT (1.6.0.200808111932) to develop my AspectJ
>> program. It compiles fine using the integrated compiler. However when
>> I try to build the same program with the iajc ant task (from AspectJ
>> 1.6.1), some of my declared errors get triggered.
>>
>> More specifically, I have an annotation that I want to be able to
>> apply only on methods of classes that implement a particular
>> interface. So I have this declaration in an aspect:
>>
>>        declare error:
>>                execution(@Scheduled * (! IJobSchedulerProvider+).*(..))
>>                : "@Scheduled method must belong to a
>> IJobSchedulerProvider";
>>
>>
>> There is no violation of this constraint in my program, and this works
>> well in AJDT.
>> However, iajc reports an error if a method has the annotation and
>> belongs to an abstract class, even if the class does implement the
>> interface. Is that a bug, or am I doing something that has borderline
>> semantics?
>>
>> Regards,
>> g
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>