RE: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

["Ron Bodkin" <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

See the discussion on bugzilla bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68603 

And enhancement request https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=113184


-----Original Message-----
From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vincenz Braun
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:07 AM
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument
type

Fine, the missing word and a missing j did not made the post useless :-)
(So args ha a instanceof semantic and one would expect aspectj not  
to  match null values.)

I think a lot of code depends on this "bug" and expects only runtime  
checks when narrowing the
argument type. (e.g. args(.., SpecialRunnable).

So this should be discussed with a broader audience. And I really  
want to know why there is no
match with the pointcut David provided...


Am 08.02.2007 um 15:49 schrieb Eric Bodden:

> On 2/8/07, Vincenz Braun <vb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So args ha a instanceof semantic and one would aspect null values  
>> not to match.
>> Normally, with statically determinable pointcuts this is not the  
>> case in aspectj:
>
> I would be surprised if this was not a bug. Surely this cannot be  
> intentional.
>
> Eric
>
> -- 
> Eric Bodden
> Sable Research Group
> McGill University, Montréal, Canada
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users