[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] declare parents syntax
|
Wes,
This is not even a workaround and don't help much for LTW. Instead of
raising errors on typos, I much prefer to not make typos at the first place.
Also reversing pointcut matching on newly introduced type look really
like an unnecessary twist to me, because the match should happen on
selected classes and not on the introduced type. I hope you can see the
logical difference between those cases.
regards,
Eugene
Wes Isberg wrote:
Just remember that
within(XyzType+)
can pick out subtypes outside com.xyz..* that extend
a type in com.xyz..*
You can name the pointcut to reuse it:
pointcut inScope() : within(com.xyz..*);
then
before(): something() && inScope() {..}
To address the problem of typo's (i.e., redundancy across
type patterns and pointcuts), try something like
declare parents : com.xyz..* : implements X;
declare warning : staticinitialization(X+)
&& !inScope() : "X not in scope";
The latter would also pick out those types not in
com.xyz..*
i.e., the subtypes outside the package.
Wes