Re: [aspectj-users] Is this possible with Aspect/J?

Re: [aspectj-users] Is this possible with Aspect/J?

From: "Cees De Groot" <cdegroot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:42:16 +0200
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F6TbH5RD4FTDZF8bQxn/kCvJ/bUMb45QTw93ZlAolGwtpxtQNu1IHymzmI8IUntUlWIacRX0uU6KPDvPOsqrUzMPvP1YcjoQUy2iLWCMz0FfbR18wTs9Fee+VdAbhZmHI9lSQb1Tf+fSTFrOn8Ys5MXXHNLT1old85OoObR7kpk=
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks. I had most of that, but:

On 7/7/06, Conway. Fintan (IT Solutions) <Fintan.Conway@xxxxxx> wrote:

A
call to proceed() without any arguments will cause the original method
to continue executing *with all of its original parameters*.


that was the bit I clearly missed :)

References:
- RE: [aspectj-users] Is this possible with Aspect/J?
  - From: Conway. Fintan (IT Solutions)