Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] Weblogic Workshop and aspectj

Ron, 
can you detail some more those reasons ? I always like to have
feedback especially negative on load time weaving
Alex

On 9/20/05, Ron DiFrango <rdifrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alex,
> 
> I did see that after I sent out my email.  Fortunately the project I am trying to weaving into is a plain java [non-EJB/Webservice, etc.] project so I do not thing the ANT step will be difficult.
> 
> Although I like the load time weaving suggestion, I am trying to avoid that for alot of reason..
> 
> Ron
> 
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:avasseur@xxxxxxxxx]
>        Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 7:25 AM
>        To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>        Cc:
>        Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Weblogic Workshop and aspectj
> 
> 
> 
>        You can export the Workshop build as an Ant script and add ajc there.
>        This is quite tedious as WLW is doing A LOT of stuff when compiling
>        your project with controls/ EJB/webService & co. My favorite approach
>        to that is to use load time weaving instead.
>        Alex
> 
>        On 9/19/05, Ron DiFrango <rdifrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>        > All,
>        >
>        > Has anyone executed an apsectj build within Weblogic Workshop [old non-Ecplise version]?  I am not looking to do the dynamic weaving method, but just the static compiled version.
>        >
>        > Thanks in advance,
>        >
>        > Ron
>        >
>        >
>        > _______________________________________________
>        > aspectj-users mailing list
>        > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>        > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        _______________________________________________
>        aspectj-users mailing list
>        aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> 
> 
> 
>


Back to the top