RE: [aspectj-users] Weblogic Workshop and aspectj

["Ron DiFrango" <rdifrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alex,
 
It really is a project/client related barrier more than anything.  I have used the LTW in WL in the past and been very happy with it.
 
The barrier I have is training, ramp up time, etc. because I have a limited timeline to get this done.  I am having a tough time convincing the team to use this in the limited scenerio [String Trimming for a DB2 database].
 
Ron

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:avasseur@xxxxxxxxx] 
	Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 9:48 AM 
	To: Ron DiFrango 
	Cc: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx 
	Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Weblogic Workshop and aspectj
	
	

	Ron,
	can you detail some more those reasons ? I always like to have
	feedback especially negative on load time weaving
	Alex
	
	On 9/20/05, Ron DiFrango <rdifrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
	> Alex,
	>
	> I did see that after I sent out my email.  Fortunately the project I am trying to weaving into is a plain java [non-EJB/Webservice, etc.] project so I do not thing the ANT step will be difficult.
	>
	> Although I like the load time weaving suggestion, I am trying to avoid that for alot of reason..
	>
	> Ron
	>
	>        -----Original Message-----
	>        From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:avasseur@xxxxxxxxx]
	>        Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 7:25 AM
	>        To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
	>        Cc:
	>        Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Weblogic Workshop and aspectj
	>
	>
	>
	>        You can export the Workshop build as an Ant script and add ajc there.
	>        This is quite tedious as WLW is doing A LOT of stuff when compiling
	>        your project with controls/ EJB/webService & co. My favorite approach
	>        to that is to use load time weaving instead.
	>        Alex
	>
	>        On 9/19/05, Ron DiFrango <rdifrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
	>        > All,
	>        >
	>        > Has anyone executed an apsectj build within Weblogic Workshop [old non-Ecplise version]?  I am not looking to do the dynamic weaving method, but just the static compiled version.
	>        >
	>        > Thanks in advance,
	>        >
	>        > Ron
	>        >
	>        >
	>        > _______________________________________________
	>        > aspectj-users mailing list
	>        > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
	>        > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
	>        >
	>        >
	>        >
	>        _______________________________________________
	>        aspectj-users mailing list
	>        aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
	>        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
	>
	>
	>
	>