Re: [aspectj-users] POLL: How do you use ".lst" files with AJDT in Eclip

[Ramnivas Laddad <ramnivas@xxxxxxxxx>]

I don't use custom .lst files that often. Most of the time, 
the default.lst suffices my needs. One place I use .lst-based 
project configuration to show plug-and-play way of adding 
functionality during my talks.

Since I always need an ANT build file, if I need a finer
control (development vs. deployment build), I just add 
additional targets.

-Ramnivas

--- Matt Chapman <MCHAPMAN@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Background: As you probably know, the "ajc" compiler can be given an
> argfile option: "ajc -argfile sources.lst" for example, or
> alternatively
> "ajc @sources.lst". The source.lst file can contain a list of files,
> references to other .lst files, and also compiler options.
> 
> For the next release of AJDT we're looking at improving the usability
> of
> defining build configurations from inside Eclipse (see ajdt-dev for
> further discussions on this topic). We naturally want to do this in a
> way
> which is intuitive for Eclipse users, whilst also providing some
> level of
> support for existing .lst files. So if you use AJDT, or might do so
> in the
> future, it would really help us if you could say how you currently
> use
> ..lst files, including the following two specific issues:
> 
> 1. Do your .lst files contain references to other .lst files? If so,
> do
> you tend to have one top level .lst file which includes various
> sub-level
> files, or something more complex?
> 2. Do you tend to include compiler options in your .lst files?
> 
> Please also say if you never use .lst files in your AJDT projects at
> all.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Matt.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>