[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[aspectj-users] no match for this type name...
|
Ramnivas -- At first I thought you were being sarcastic when you wrote:
> For the error message, how about something like:
> "Unknown type MessageCommunicator. Please ensure correct
> spelling and/or the type is visible to the source file
> (check your import statements or use the fully-qualified
> type name)".
And then I saw the following:
> The downside I see is sheer verbosity of the message.
> Perhaps a better alternative is to point to document
> that elaborates on "Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName".
I think the latter is much more preferable than the former. But I think *BOTH* miss the
point that I was trying to make earlier, which is: if I were using standard Java
(with/without Eclipse), and I had forgotten the package statement, I would have gotten
the following message: "The declared package does not match the expected package xxxxx".
NOT the statement: "no match for this type name: XXXX [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]".
I mean --- this is almost as good as a 1970's ABEND NNNN statement.
In your book, you state that ajc is a superset of javac. Which is fine as far as it goes,
but (I wish the AJC developers had decided to) add in the syntax and semantics that AOP
requires, but *don't mess with standard java*, especially the error messages and warnings
that you would expect to see if *writing standard Java*. If the package and import
statements are valid within an aspect, treat them as they would a standard Java
statement, and issue the standard messages we have all grown to know and love.
NONE of this is YOUR FAULT. However, there was a suggestion on this forum to start
documenting errors like as to probable causes. As much as it would have helped me, I
would prefer that aspect users get together and start demanding tools from ajc developers
that build upon the knowledge that they already know, and do not require
learning/generating differential diagnoses for symptoms they have never seen.
FWTW,
Michael
=====
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/