[aspectj-users] Re: Encapsulating domain specific code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[aspectj-users] Re: Encapsulating domain specific code

From: Matthew Webster <matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:10:26 +0000
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-users/>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sensitivity:



This looks like a nested version of the Worker Object creation pattern form
"AspectJ in Action", Ramnivas Laddad. If you place the core code in a
separate method you can use around closure advice to add the domain
specific thread dispatch. You will need to refactor to isolate the core
code.

Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester,  SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/

Prev by Date: [aspectj-users] Re: Why need AspectJ all libraries of my .jar I want to instrument
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] Re: Detecting methods being called in the execution of another method
Previous by thread: [aspectj-users] Re: Why need AspectJ all libraries of my .jar I want to instrument
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] Re: advanced(?) percflow uses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs